Exposing Canadian Court Corruption

I'M TRYING TO MOVE ON WITH MY LIFE. THEY WON'T LET ME. THIS IS WHAT EMOTIONAL AND FINANCIAL ABUSE LOOKS LIKE.

This is what you call emotional and financial abuse. This is what you call an abuse of the court processes, wasting valuable court resources on nonsense like this. Look at John David Ekpenyong’s unhinged materials. This guy just will not leave me alone.

I have made two dozen attempts recently to make payments. I offered again to make payments and take down the post, and they simply ignore me because this piece of shit wants nothing more than for me to lose my apartment, lose my vehicle, and lose my animals.

This is the type of human being John David Ekpenyong is. His mind is filled with evil. Look at him lying on this application. Look at the gaslighting. This is what he does. All he knows how to do is lie, manipulate, and gaslight.

My restraining order simply says I cannot communicate with this woman and cannot go anywhere I know she is. I have made this clear over the past five years. I want nothing to do with these lunatics. I’ve moved on with my life. I have an amazing girlfriend. Why can’t these people just move on with their lives, stop with the lies, and stop engaging in this type of criminal behaviour?

Read the materials for yourself. Where does it say I contacted her? Now her doctor is involved because I’ve gone public about reporting what I believe to be their insurance fraud and Botox fraud.

Dr. Kim Ireland has a recorded conversation. Nowhere in that conversation did I say to contact her patient. Nowhere in these materials does it show that I have been in Cambridge.

This is what I’m dealing with on a daily basis. All I’m trying to do is help my community and make people aware of what is happening, but you can’t do that when you’re dealing with a government that allows this type of behaviour.

You cannot do that when the Law Society of Ontario allows lawyers to enter its society who, in my opinion, have bought the answers and cheated their way into obtaining an Ontario law licence.

This is just fucking insane!

The courts, the Law Society, the police — nobody will help. Judges continue to allow these two individuals to constantly abuse, harass, threaten, and misuse the courts.

This is what pushes people to the breaking point. They snap. They become violent. They hurt people. It feels like they’re trying to push me to that point. Meanwhile, I’m simply trying to stay as far away from these people as possible, and they will not leave me alone.

On top of all this bullshit, I’m dealing with a gravely ill cat that I can’t even properly take care of because these two people have financially suffocated me by submitting what I believe are fraudulent court cost requests.

My bank accounts have been frozen for almost 30 months, and these fucking people still will not accept a payment plan.

How is that not an abuse of the courts?

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5

6 days ago | [YT] | 0

Exposing Canadian Court Corruption

Thank you to the 505 people who stand in solidarity with me and demand that the Law Society of Ontario properly investigate shady lawyer John David Ekpenyong and his credentials, as he was the only person in 2016 to attend zero Canadian law schools, challenge the Ontario bar exam, and pass.

I’ve dealt with this lawyer for almost five years, and you would not believe what he has gotten away with if I hadn’t documented it and shared it with the public the way I have.

Thank you again to everyone who supports me in exposing corruption and simply asking for accountability.

If I can reach 1,000 signatures, I’ll put this up on a huge billboard outside the Law Society building and demand that CEO Tom Teahen, along with complaints operations manager Christopher Wight and fraud investigator Ari Kashton, properly investigate my complaints and concerns regarding John David Ekpenyong’s unprofessional, unethical, and criminal behaviour.

www.change.org/p/law-society-of-ontario-needs-to-p…

FB: Canadian Court Nightmare Stories

FB: Canadian Court Corruption and Government Overreach

#LawSocietyOfOntario #Accountability #JusticeForAll #ExposeCorruption #LegalAccountability #OntarioLaw #LawyerMisconduct #LegalEthics #Transparency #DemandAccountability #AccessToJustice #CanadianJusticeSystem #PublicAccountability #Investigate #StandForJustice #LegalReform #StopCorruption #SpeakUpCanada #JusticeMatters #SignThePetition

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 0

Exposing Canadian Court Corruption

Nothing but systematic corruption dealing with the MAG…

This past year, I have submitted 15 Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and every single time, MAG employee Anne-Marie Santini has handled those requests.

The Ministry of the Attorney General (MAG) has a strict 30-day deadline to respond to FOI requests. However, that has never been my experience when dealing with Ms. Santini. Every request has gone well past the deadline, with some taking over 120 days. Even when she finally responds, she consistently denies my requests, referencing Section 19 of the Freedom of Information legislation, citing solicitor-client privilege, when nine times out of ten, that justification does not apply to the information I am requesting.

This is the same excuse she used when I tried to find out which prosecutor dropped the charges against disgraced judge Paul Currie, who faced numerous sexual assault charges and retired before he was about to face disciplinary proceedings before the Canadian Judicial Council.

She also used this same reasoning to deny my request to identify which Ministry of the Attorney General employee contacted YouTube to have 35 of my videos blocked from being viewed in Canada.

I believe this raises serious concerns about my Charter rights under Section 2(b), which protects freedom of expression. The Ministry of the Attorney General has, in my view, seriously infringed upon my Charter rights, and these ongoing delays and denials, along with what I believe are unacceptable excuses for withholding information from the public, are deeply concerning.

Can Canadians ever trust the government when this is how the Ministry of the Attorney General treats members of the public?

If you submit a Freedom of Information request and Ms. Santini handles it, this has been my experience: significant delays, followed by denials that repeatedly rely on solicitor-client privilege.

I have another outstanding request that she still has not answered, and it is approaching 90 days. This request concerns my belief that the Ministry of the Attorney General may have altered a court audio recording involving a Milton judge who humiliated me in front of approximately 30 people. I strongly suspect that portions of the court proceeding may have been tampered with, deleted, or altered to protect a judge. I want answers, and I believe the public deserves transparency regarding what happened.

I would encourage everyone who has dealt with court proceedings to consider filing Freedom of Information requests for specific records and information. This is how we can gather evidence and determine whether the concerns I have raised reflect a broader pattern of conduct within the Ministry of the Attorney General.

Another major concern is Alline Haddad of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (IPC), who handled my appeal regarding my request to identify the individual who contacted YouTube on behalf of the Ministry of the Attorney General.

The Ministry eventually confirmed its involvement, but the identity of the employee who made the request remained undisclosed. I believe Ms. Haddad failed to properly pursue my appeal and challenge Ms. Santini’s reliance on Section 19. In my view, the fact that YouTube is not a client of the Crown raises serious questions about whether solicitor-client privilege was properly applied in this situation.

As a result, I have had to file another appeal just to try to obtain this information.

Unfortunately, I believe both of these public servants have failed to meet the standards of transparency and accountability that Canadians should expect from those serving the public. I have filed a complaint against Ms. Haddad, which, according to the IPC’s own stated timelines, took 12 days to acknowledge, despite its stated minimum acknowledgment period of 10 business days.

I am also concerned that the IPC appears to be protecting Ms. Haddad rather than properly addressing my complaint about the deletion of an email thread and what I believe was a failure to adequately pursue my appeal. I will be addressing that issue in another upcoming post.

I encourage everyone who has dealt with the courts or any government ministry to consider submitting Freedom of Information requests. We need to gather evidence, demand transparency, and determine whether there is a common pattern of delays, denials, and unfair treatment by the Ministry of the Attorney General.

The public deserves answers, transparency, and accountability. What I have experienced has raised serious concerns about the way these public institutions operate, and I refuse to remain silent about it.

FB: Canadian Court Nightmare Stories

FB: Canadian Court Corruption and Government Overreach

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 0

Exposing Canadian Court Corruption

Can the body that oversees federal judges refuse to look at whether a judge fabricated evidence?

That question will be argued in the Federal Court tomorrow.

Tuesday, October 13, 2026, 9:30 a.m. (about 3 hours)
Abedi v. Attorney General of Canada, Court File No. T-1642-25

WHAT HAPPENED

A parent filed a complaint with the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) about a judge's conduct. The CJC is the body responsible for complaints about federally appointed judges.

The CJC gave him 15 days to send supporting materials. It dismissed his complaint on day 10.

He asked the CJC to reopen the complaint so the materials could be considered. In its final decision, the CJC said it "does not have the authority to examine whether a judge fabricated evidence."

He is now asking the Federal Court to review that decision. The Attorney General of Canada is defending it.

WHY IT MATTERS TO EVERYONE

If the CJC will not look at a complaint that a judge fabricated evidence, who will? This case asks whether the people who oversee judges have to actually consider the complaints they receive, and give real reasons when they dismiss them.

The applicant has no lawyer. He is arguing this case himself against the federal government's lawyers.

WHY YOUR ATTENDANCE MATTERS

Court hearings are open to the public, and a full courtroom shows the court that people are paying attention to how complaints about judges are handled. You don't need to say or do anything. Just being there makes a difference.

TO ATTEND IN PERSON

Federal Court, 180 Queen Street West, Toronto, Courtroom 4C
Please arrive by 9:00 a.m. to get through security.

TO ASK TO WATCH ONLINE (ZOOM)

The hearing is currently listed as in person only. A request has been made for the public to be allowed to watch online. The more people who ask, the better.

Email HEARINGS-AUDIENCES@FCT-CF.CA as soon as possible with:

Subject: Request to observe T-1642-25 - October 13, 2026

Hello,

I would like to observe the hearing in T-1642-25, Syed Roman Abedi v. Attorney General of Canada, on Tuesday, October 13, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. If remote observation is made available, please send me the registration link.

Thank you,

R.A

If the Court allows it, you'll get a Zoom registration link by email. Your camera and microphone will be off.

Recording, photos, screenshots or posting any part of the hearing are strictly prohibited.

Please share with anyone who cares about accountability in our courts.

FB: Canadian Court Nightmare Stories

FB: Canadian Court Corruption and Government Overreach

#CanadianJudicialAccountability
#FederalCourt
#CanadianJudicialCouncil
#JusticeForAll
#JudicialTransparency
#AccountabilityInCanada
#RuleOfLaw
#CharterRights
#Section2b
#FreedomOfExpression
#AccessToJustice
#JusticeReform
#GovernmentAccountability
#PublicInterest
#CourtWatch
#JudicialOversight
#CanadianLaw
#HumanRights
#DemocracyMatters
#ShareForAwareness

4 weeks ago | [YT] | 0

Exposing Canadian Court Corruption

John David Ekpenyong and his unhinged client still refuse to be reasonable and resolve this nightmare they created…

It’s going on three weeks since I sent this email to the lawyer, probably my 50th request to resolve these matters with this lunatic and his unhinged client, who refused to be reasonable, refused to accept a payment plan, and refused to stop harassing me by abusing the courts and wasting their very limited resources.

This is what I meant in my pervious post suggesting that John David Ekpenyong is a terrorist because, to me, it’s obvious he is a terrorist who thrives off terrorizing innocent lives. Justice Goldstein even admitted in her endorsement in 2012 that Ekpenyong’s mind is filled with evil and that his materials are straight-up vexatious and frivolous. If that is the obvious truth, why couldn’t these judges in the Kitchener Waterloo courthouse I’ve mentioned publicly see that as well? Well, I believe they did, but he wasn’t on the radar.

Read the full endorsement here:

www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2012/2012onsc5530/20…

I was the person these psychopath lawyers in fancy robes attempted to annihilate my reputation, and my finances. They have destroyed my reputation and finances by allowing this lunatic and his unhinged client to practically get away with murder. What they did get away with was catastrophic fraud and perjury, which insurance company Definity, Waterloo Region Police and Halton Region Police have shown and even admitted they don’t care about insurance fraud when it comes to the fraud and perjury that was reported.

John David Ekpenyong is a deranged, unhinged lunatic who, in my opinion, cheated his way into obtaining his Ontario bar licence. It’s obvious to me that he uses AI programs that most lawyers are using. A study was done in 2022, and graduates over 50% of all lawyers are using AI software now, and I believe Ekpenyong is one of those.

I want to thank the 469 people who signed my petition demanding that the Law Society of Ontario properly investigate John David Ekpenyong’s credentials, because at this point, they are refusing to do that. I think it’s obvious that Ekpenyong cheated his way into the Law Society of Ontario.

He’s admitted to committing fraud. He’s admitted to committing perjury. Yet those in authority continue to refuse to hold him and his client responsible for their actions and crimes. These are no longer minor misconducts. In my opinion, these are crimes committed when you compare their actions to the Canadian Criminal Code.

It shouldn’t have to go this far. This amount of damage should not have been done to demand basic answers that, collectively, the Law Society of Ontario, the Waterloo Regional Police, and the Halton Regional Police simply refused to investigate.

If they’re not going to investigate this compelling, organized, and simplified information that John David Ekpenyong and his client have engaged in major fraud and perjury, then I guess the message is clear: everybody should engage in these types of crimes because those with authority refuse to investigate, those who are getting paid handsome six-figure salaries, and those who’s job is to investigate this type of information, yet they refuse to do so.

I said this before, and I’ll continue to say this: these people continue to put me in this uncomfortable position. The only option seems to becontinue speaking about these events publicly. And if you don’t know by now, I’m very persistent and very passionate about doing the right thing! What happened to me should never have happened!

And now you’ve got the Ministry of the Attorney General and the Crown’s Office collaborating with these criminals, violating my constitutional and Charter rights by trying to silence me and trying to silence the truth. A clear violation of charter right 2(B) freedom of expression.

If you’re going to continue to support John David Ekpenyong, then you should be guilty by association. You should be guilty for trying to protect this man for the crimes he’s committed.

I’m asking everybody again to please share, sign this petition, and help demand that this lawyer be properly investigated. Hopefully, we can get answers about his credentials and the allegations that have been raised.

Please read this petition, please sign, please share, and let’s try to get up to 500 signatures by the end of the weekend.

Thank you guys for reading this, and thank you for your support.

PLEASE READ,SIGN AND SHARE THIS PETITION TO HAVE THE LAW SOCIETY OF ONTARIO TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE JOHN DAVID EKPENYONG’S CREDENTIALS.

BECAUSE I AM CALLING BULLSHIT!

www.change.org/p/law-society-of-ontario-needs-to-p…

FB: Canadian Court Nightmare Stories

FB: Canadian Court Corruption and Government Overreach

#InvestigativeJournalism
#JournalismMatters
#FreedomOfInformation
#FOI
#PublicAccountability
#GovernmentAccountability
#TransparencyMatters
#AccessToInformation
#CharterRights
#FreedomOfExpression
#FreeSpeech
#PublicInterest
#GovernmentTransparency
#AccountabilityMatters
#DueProcess
#RuleOfLaw
#JusticeSystem
#LegalAccountability
#Ontario
#Canada

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3

1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 0

Exposing Canadian Court Corruption

I can’t help but ask the question: what is Assistant Deputy Attorney General Katie Wood doing taking so much time off of work?

Is this going to be her excuse for why she has not gotten back to me, like she told me she would back this past March 2026, when she promised me she would get me a copy of those deficiency letters that were supposed to be included in my family court case at the Kitchener courthouse?

A deficiency letter was supposed to accompany that restraining order application that was commissioned and never signed, yet Court Services and Operations Manager Kerri Rice over at the Kitchener Courthouse accepted it. Or how about being forced to go to a trial without the Trial Scheduling and Endorsement Form ever being filled out, served, and filed, which is a procedural violation of Family Law Rule 17, subrule 11? This form must be filled out, served, and filed before any trial is scheduled, yet this was never filed, and Court Services and assistant trial coordinator Sloane French scheduled the trial anyways.

Ms. Katie Wood is Doug Downey’s right-hand woman when it comes to court corruption and cover-up. Katie Wood is in charge of Court Services across Ontario. Her colleagues continue to ignore me and attempt to silence me, while now the clock has been reset from our conversation for a potential constitutional and human rights violation that Court Services, the Attorney General, and the provincial government did to me from 2022 to 2025.

Katie Wood knows, especially after listening to that phone call from our conversation. She’s attempting to cover up Court Services’ corruption and misconduct. That was not going to happen. So what is she doing? Is she consulting with her colleagues?

If you look at the emails, I got her out-of-office from this year, from May 2026 to August 2026—three months. She’s almost taken off four weeks, so where is Ms. Katie and what is she doing?

Let’s not forget, last year she received a $125,000 raise, totaling her salary to $325,000 a year. Yet this public servant refuses to do her basic duty. All she’s done, in my experience, is engage in Court Services’ corruption and misconduct. She’s a fall person, and she screwed up big-time, and she knows it, and I think her colleagues do as well.

I have a rough draft statement of claim already put together with a team of people who are helping me, but like I said before, here’s the kicker: I don’t want to sue anybody. I just want these public servants, who are paid way too much money, to bare minimum next to nothing, to simply do their job.

This is what Canadians can anticipate potentially being up against: a two-tier, corrupted, broken justice system where you have bigwigs like Ms. Katie Wood in charge of Court Services, engaging in major corruption and misconduct, and she knows it, and she’s been caught. You can confirm that from our conversation, in my materials before the courts, and our conversation that’s gone viral.

So my question is, when are Canadians going to step up and start saying enough is enough and start sharing their experiences with abusive, corrupt, and unfair public servants? These people seem to be trying to fill their pockets and fatten their pensions, as it’s the sky’s the limit.

I’m still waiting for Ms. Katie Wood’s response, but again, another kicker: those deficiency letters don’t exist because I’ve already contacted Freedom of Information. In fact, I’ve got 15 requests pending, most of them. I’ve had appeals through the IPC, and I’ve got a lot of new information that I’m going to be sharing with the public in the coming months and years.

So wherever Ms. Katie is, I’d like to know: where are these deficiency letters that she apparently says existed, and why hasn’t she ever gotten back to me?

If you guys are frustrated and fed up with this government corruption, and you’ve experienced something similar, don’t hold back and share your experience. That’s why this group was created.

FB: Canadian Court Nightmare Stories

FB: Canadian Court Corruption and Government Overreach

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

2 months ago (edited) | [YT] | 0