I went to see Joker 2 in the cinema today. SPOILERS! it's a shame that Joker's potential was never revealed. n even more so that they got rid of Arthur himself at the end. I definitely like the first part more than the second. the first part is filled with food for thought. the second part is like just a story without subtext. I'm a crazy fan of Joker, so I wanted to see more of Joker himself in the film than Arthur. in the second part we were shown that the Joker is not Arthur's alter ego, but himself. but I think it was also clear in the first part that the Joker is, in some sense, Arthur's mood, a sudden surge of strength. in the second film it was said that this is a state of affect. but it is unclear why then devote the second part to this, if everything was clear before. but overall the movie turned out to be not bad, even good. it's a pity that there definitely won't be a third part. I would like to see a continuation of the story
Diprida
I went to see Joker 2 in the cinema today. SPOILERS! it's a shame that Joker's potential was never revealed. n even more so that they got rid of Arthur himself at the end. I definitely like the first part more than the second. the first part is filled with food for thought. the second part is like just a story without subtext. I'm a crazy fan of Joker, so I wanted to see more of Joker himself in the film than Arthur. in the second part we were shown that the Joker is not Arthur's alter ego, but himself. but I think it was also clear in the first part that the Joker is, in some sense, Arthur's mood, a sudden surge of strength. in the second film it was said that this is a state of affect. but it is unclear why then devote the second part to this, if everything was clear before. but overall the movie turned out to be not bad, even good. it's a pity that there definitely won't be a third part. I would like to see a continuation of the story
2 years ago | [YT] | 20
View 2 replies