Mosque committee members often feel they’re above the law. Issues like behaviour and fund abuse are common, though a lack of transparency is also prevalent. I personally had a negative experience with a mosque committee member.
MOSQUE COMMITTEES DILEMA! | POWER TRIP! | NUNEATON MUSLIM SOCIETY
Gatekeeping receipts and documentation after collecting donations for dawah is no different in principle from the way Tommy Robinson and his sidekick use every technicality they can to squeeze donations from their followers. The same arguments and excuses are being used.
I remember asking @MuslimOrthodoxy to provide documentation / receipts for his GoFundMe for his medical treatment. His response was: “You didn’t donate, so I don’t need to show you anything.” Those were his words, verbatim. After @Channel4 questioned @TommyRobinsonOnline about where the donated money had gone, imagine if Tommy simply used that same response: “You didn’t donate, so I don’t need to show you or anyone anything.”
If that standard is accepted, then Channel 4 Dispatches would have no right to ask questions either or Tommy could simply say, “I’ve shown the evidence to someone close to me,” and declare the matter closed. It sounds ridiculous, doesn’t it?
That is exactly why there needs to be full transparency when people collect public donations: documentation, receipts, and a clear paper trail. If you ask the public to trust you with their money, accountability should not depend on whether a particular individual donated. They think they are cute but we can’t see through act and charade.
What do fair right and Dawah mercenaries have in common? They’re mercenaries and grifters! It’s all about performance and how they perform to get your money.
Hello @AliDawah, which luxurious hotel are you booking this time? Perhaps it’s funded by Talmudic loopholes or charity money you flip according to your own admission. Or maybe it’s oil scam profits or commission. How do you manage to incorporate and dissolve businesses with basic annual returns while affording luxurious holidays and staying in six-star hotels? I’m curious about your business practices.
@ustadhrhyad, where is the mosque you promised to build for the ummah two years ago? You took £120,000 from them. What happened to the money?
@MuslimOrthodoxy, you estimated your treatment at $5000 and paid a hefty deposit. How much was the deposit and the total cost of the treatment? Your GoFundMe page raised over $35,000. Do you think you don’t owe an explanation or that your wealth is somehow a loot?
Tommy Robinson, Danny Tommo and the Dawah Mercenaries are two sides of the same coin.
لَيْسَ كُلُّ قَرِيبٍ صَدِيقًا، وَلَيْسَ كُلُّ الْكَلَامِ صَادِقًا، وَلَيْسَ كُلُّ الظَّاهِرِ كَالْبَاطِنِ. Not everyone who is close to you is a friend. Not every word spoken is truthful. And not everything that appears outwardly is the same as what is inwardly.
Don’t be fooled by their fake religiosity. These mercenaries are no different from past rabbis and monks who exploited religion for personal gain. They’re hypocrites and unworthy of the title of Du’aat. Keep pressing them and ask them the uncomfortable questions
I’m sure whoever has watched my videos on free mixing knows my stance on this matter. Ali Dawah is once again oversimplifying the issue by using his usual rabbinical Talmudic loopholes. He wanted to insinuate, based on the hadith in which ʿUmar رضي الله عنه advised the Prophet ﷺ: O Messenger of Allah, let your wives be veiled.” But the Messenger of Allah ﷺ did not do so.
Ali then goes on a rant asking, Do you have more ghayrah than the Prophet ﷺ? while completely missing the context of the hadith. He conveniently left out the very next part of the narration:
I recognised you, O Sawdah. He said this because he eagerly desired that the verses of hijab be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of hijab.
This emphasises that Umar رضي الله عنه was waiting for revelation from the Qur’an. The reason the Prophet ﷺ did not command hijab before that point was simple: it had not yet been revealed to him by Allah. It’s that simple. Let me educate this fool even further.
When the Muslims were being persecuted, tortured, and killed in Makkah, the Prophet ﷺ did not command his followers to fight. Why? Do you think the Prophet ﷺ was afraid? Astaghfirullah. Rather, he was waiting for revelation from Allah. The permission to fight came after the migration to Madinah, not before.
Ibn Kathir, in his tafisr, mentions:
قال العوفي، عن ابن عباس: نزلت في محمد وأصحابه حين أخرجوا من مكة. وقال غير واحد من السلف: هذه أول آية نزلت في الجهاد، واستدل بهذه الآية بعضهم على أن السورة مدنية، وقاله مجاهد، والضحاك، وقتادة، وغير واحد.
Al-Awfi narrated from Ibn ʿAbbās that he said: This verse was revealed concerning Muhammad ﷺ and his companions when they were expelled from Makkah.
A number of the early scholars said: “This was the first verse revealed concerning jihad.” Some of them used this verse as evidence that this sūrah is Madinan. This was also the view of Mujāhid, al-Ḍaḥḥāk, Qatādah, and a number of other scholars.
Ibn Kathir then explains:
وإن الله على نصرهم لقدير ) وقد . وإنما شرع [ الله ] تعالى الجهاد في الوقت الأليق به; لأنهم لما كانوا بمكة كان المشركون أكثر عددا ، فلو أمر المسلمين ، وهم أقل من العشر ، بقتال الباقين لشق عليهم; ولهذا لما بايع أهل يثرب ليلة العقبة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ، وكانوا نيفا وثمانين ، قالوا : يا رسول الله ، ألا نميل على أهل الوادي يعنون أهل منى ليالي منى فنقتلهم؟
Allahonly legislated jihad at the time most appropriate for it. While the Muslims were in Makkah, the polytheists greatly outnumbered them. Had Allah commanded the Muslims who were fewer than one-tenth of their enemies to fight at that stage, it would have been an unbearable hardship for them. For this reason, when the people of Yathrib pledged allegiance to the Messenger of Allah ﷺ on the night of al-ʿAqabah, and they numbered a little over eighty, they said: O Messenger of Allah, shall we attack the people of the valley? meaning the people of Mina during the nights of Mina and kill them?”
The Messenger of Allah ﷺ replied:
إني لم أؤمر بهذا
I have not been commanded to do that. The Prophet ﷺ made it absolutely clear: “I have not been commanded to do that. Likewise, in the case of hijab, he did not do so as per the hadith until Allah revealed it. The principle is exactly the same: the Prophet ﷺ acted upon revelation, not personal preference or public pressure.
He presents another hadith and, once again, tries to employ a Talmudic technicality. However, I will show that even this hadith has a context.
He reads the hadith in Sahih al-Bukhari, which contains the words, “A man came to the Prophet ﷺ,” and proceeds to present his own weak and twisted opinion. If he had read Sahih Muslim, it would have been clear that the man who came to the Prophet ﷺ was in a severe condition. It states:
جَاءَ رَجُلٌ إِلَى رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ إِنِّي مَجْهُودٌ
A man came to the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and said, ‘I am hard-pressed by hunger.’
Imam al-Nawawi, when explaining this hadith, said:
قوله : ( إني مجهود ) أي أصابني الجهد ، وهو المشقة والحاجة وسوء العيش والجوع
His statement, I am hard-pressed, means that hardship had afflicted him; that is, toil, need, poor living conditions, and hunger. Indeed, the man was afflicted by hardship, poverty, difficult living conditions, and hunger.
Furthermore, Imam al-Nawawi states:
وأما هو وامرأته فآثرا على أنفسهما برضاهما مع حاجتهما وخصاصتهم
As for him and his wife, they gave preference to their guest over themselves, seeking Allah’s pleasure, despite their own need and deprivation. This idiot doesn’t understand that the man entered afterwards. The husband told his wife that when the guest entered, she should extinguish the lamp and give him the impression that they were eating. They then sat down, and the guest ate his meal.
When our guest enters, extinguish the lamp and give him the impression that we are eating. When he reaches out to eat, get up and extinguish the lamp.” He said: So they sat down, and the guest ate. The guest could not see them, and they honoured their guest, who was desperate due to his condition.
This mercenary is desperate and has no clue what he is talking about. Rather, he simply follows his vain desires. Keep pushing out ridiculous content with scammers or accomplices of scammers.
That completely destroys Ali Dawah’s argument, the idiot @AliDawah
Bro Hajji
Mosque committee members often feel they’re above the law. Issues like behaviour and fund abuse are common, though a lack of transparency is also prevalent. I personally had a negative experience with a mosque committee member.
MOSQUE COMMITTEES DILEMA! | POWER TRIP! | NUNEATON MUSLIM SOCIETY
2 days ago | [YT] | 10
View 0 replies
Bro Hajji
We have the Epstein class and within our ummah we have the rabbinical class. @AbdeenTube
#brohajji
#ummah
#allah
#muhammad
3 days ago (edited) | [YT] | 10
View 0 replies
Bro Hajji
Comedy hour is back everyone! Don’t laugh too hard though 😝
#brohajji
#allah
#islam
4 days ago | [YT] | 8
View 2 replies
Bro Hajji
Masters in hadith 😝- Video coming soon إن شاء الله @OneMessageFoundation
6 days ago | [YT] | 82
View 40 replies
Bro Hajji
These individuals – fake laboratory certificates, oil scams and fake masters in Hadith – truly are Rabbis of this ummah. @ChaiWithMyBhai
1 week ago | [YT] | 8
View 0 replies
Bro Hajji
I’ve seen far-right groups and Dawah mercenaries asking for money so I thought I’d ask for absolutely no reason. Would you like to support me? 😝
gofund.me/b9e0fbca0
1 week ago | [YT] | 50
View 10 replies
Bro Hajji
Gatekeeping receipts and documentation after collecting donations for dawah is no different in principle from the way Tommy Robinson and his sidekick use every technicality they can to squeeze donations from their followers. The same arguments and excuses are being used.
I remember asking @MuslimOrthodoxy to provide documentation / receipts for his GoFundMe for his medical treatment. His response was: “You didn’t donate, so I don’t need to show you anything.” Those were his words, verbatim. After @Channel4 questioned @TommyRobinsonOnline about where the donated money had gone, imagine if Tommy simply used that same response: “You didn’t donate, so I don’t need to show you or anyone anything.”
If that standard is accepted, then Channel 4 Dispatches would have no right to ask questions either or Tommy could simply say, “I’ve shown the evidence to someone close to me,” and declare the matter closed. It sounds ridiculous, doesn’t it?
That is exactly why there needs to be full transparency when people collect public donations: documentation, receipts, and a clear paper trail. If you ask the public to trust you with their money, accountability should not depend on whether a particular individual donated. They think they are cute but we can’t see through act and charade.
1 week ago | [YT] | 56
View 9 replies
Bro Hajji
What do fair right and Dawah mercenaries have in common? They’re mercenaries and grifters! It’s all about performance and how they perform to get your money.
Hello @AliDawah, which luxurious hotel are you booking this time? Perhaps it’s funded by Talmudic loopholes or charity money you flip according to your own admission. Or maybe it’s oil scam profits or commission. How do you manage to incorporate and dissolve businesses with basic annual returns while affording luxurious holidays and staying in six-star hotels? I’m curious about your business practices.
@ustadhrhyad, where is the mosque you promised to build for the ummah two years ago? You took £120,000 from them. What happened to the money?
@MuslimOrthodoxy, you estimated your treatment at $5000 and paid a hefty deposit. How much was the deposit and the total cost of the treatment? Your GoFundMe page raised over $35,000. Do you think you don’t owe an explanation or that your wealth is somehow a loot?
Tommy Robinson, Danny Tommo and the Dawah Mercenaries are two sides of the same coin.
1 week ago | [YT] | 88
View 14 replies
Bro Hajji
لَيْسَ كُلُّ قَرِيبٍ صَدِيقًا، وَلَيْسَ كُلُّ الْكَلَامِ صَادِقًا، وَلَيْسَ كُلُّ الظَّاهِرِ كَالْبَاطِنِ.
Not everyone who is close to you is a friend. Not every word spoken is truthful. And not everything that appears outwardly is the same as what is inwardly.
Don’t be fooled by their fake religiosity. These mercenaries are no different from past rabbis and monks who exploited religion for personal gain. They’re hypocrites and unworthy of the title of Du’aat. Keep pressing them and ask them the uncomfortable questions
1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 62
View 4 replies
Bro Hajji
I’m sure whoever has watched my videos on free mixing knows my stance on this matter. Ali Dawah is once again oversimplifying the issue by using his usual rabbinical Talmudic loopholes. He wanted to insinuate, based on the hadith in which ʿUmar رضي الله عنه advised the Prophet ﷺ: O Messenger of Allah, let your wives be veiled.” But the Messenger of Allah ﷺ did not do so.
Ali then goes on a rant asking, Do you have more ghayrah than the Prophet ﷺ? while completely missing the context of the hadith. He conveniently left out the very next part of the narration:
قَدْ عَرَفْنَاكِ يَا سَوْدَةُ. حِرْصًا عَلَى أَنْ يَنْزِلَ الْحِجَابُ، فَأَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ آيَةَ الْحِجَابِ
I recognised you, O Sawdah. He said this because he eagerly desired that the verses of hijab be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of hijab.
This emphasises that Umar رضي الله عنه was waiting for revelation from the Qur’an. The reason the Prophet ﷺ did not command hijab before that point was simple: it had not yet been revealed to him by Allah. It’s that simple. Let me educate this fool even further.
When the Muslims were being persecuted, tortured, and killed in Makkah, the Prophet ﷺ did not command his followers to fight. Why? Do you think the Prophet ﷺ was afraid? Astaghfirullah. Rather, he was waiting for revelation from Allah. The permission to fight came after the migration to Madinah, not before.
Ibn Kathir, in his tafisr, mentions:
قال العوفي، عن ابن عباس: نزلت في محمد وأصحابه حين أخرجوا من مكة. وقال غير واحد من السلف: هذه أول آية نزلت في الجهاد، واستدل بهذه الآية بعضهم على أن السورة مدنية، وقاله مجاهد، والضحاك، وقتادة، وغير واحد.
Al-Awfi narrated from Ibn ʿAbbās that he said: This verse was revealed concerning Muhammad ﷺ and his companions when they were expelled from Makkah.
A number of the early scholars said: “This was the first verse revealed concerning jihad.” Some of them used this verse as evidence that this sūrah is Madinan. This was also the view of Mujāhid, al-Ḍaḥḥāk, Qatādah, and a number of other scholars.
Ibn Kathir then explains:
وإن الله على نصرهم لقدير ) وقد .
وإنما شرع [ الله ] تعالى الجهاد في الوقت الأليق به; لأنهم لما كانوا بمكة كان المشركون أكثر عددا ، فلو أمر المسلمين ، وهم أقل من العشر ، بقتال الباقين لشق عليهم; ولهذا لما بايع أهل يثرب ليلة العقبة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ، وكانوا نيفا وثمانين ، قالوا : يا رسول الله ، ألا نميل على أهل الوادي يعنون أهل منى ليالي منى فنقتلهم؟
Allahonly legislated jihad at the time most appropriate for it. While the Muslims were in Makkah, the polytheists greatly outnumbered them. Had Allah commanded the Muslims who were fewer than one-tenth of their enemies to fight at that stage, it would have been an unbearable hardship for them. For this reason, when the people of Yathrib pledged allegiance to the Messenger of Allah ﷺ on the night of al-ʿAqabah, and they numbered a little over eighty, they said: O Messenger of Allah, shall we attack the people of the valley? meaning the people of Mina during the nights of Mina and kill them?”
The Messenger of Allah ﷺ replied:
إني لم أؤمر بهذا
I have not been commanded to do that. The Prophet ﷺ made it absolutely clear: “I have not been commanded to do that. Likewise, in the case of hijab, he did not do so as per the hadith until Allah revealed it. The principle is exactly the same: the Prophet ﷺ acted upon revelation, not personal preference or public pressure.
He presents another hadith and, once again, tries to employ a Talmudic technicality. However, I will show that even this hadith has a context.
He reads the hadith in Sahih al-Bukhari, which contains the words, “A man came to the Prophet ﷺ,” and proceeds to present his own weak and twisted opinion. If he had read Sahih Muslim, it would have been clear that the man who came to the Prophet ﷺ was in a severe condition. It states:
جَاءَ رَجُلٌ إِلَى رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ إِنِّي مَجْهُودٌ
A man came to the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and said, ‘I am hard-pressed by hunger.’
Imam al-Nawawi, when explaining this hadith, said:
قوله : ( إني مجهود ) أي أصابني الجهد ، وهو المشقة والحاجة وسوء العيش والجوع
His statement, I am hard-pressed, means that hardship had afflicted him; that is, toil, need, poor living conditions, and hunger. Indeed, the man was afflicted by hardship, poverty, difficult living conditions, and hunger.
Furthermore, Imam al-Nawawi states:
وأما هو وامرأته فآثرا على أنفسهما برضاهما مع حاجتهما وخصاصتهم
As for him and his wife, they gave preference to their guest over themselves, seeking Allah’s pleasure, despite their own need and deprivation. This idiot doesn’t understand that the man entered afterwards. The husband told his wife that when the guest entered, she should extinguish the lamp and give him the impression that they were eating. They then sat down, and the guest ate his meal.
إِذَا دَخَلَ ضَيْفُنَا فَأَطْفِئِي السِّرَاجَ وَأَرِيهِ أَنَّا نَأْكُلُ فَإِذَا أَهْوَى لِيَأْكُلَ فَقُومِي إِلَى السِّرَاجِ حَتَّى تُطْفِئِيهِ . قَالَ فَقَعَدُوا وَأَكَلَ الضَّيْفُ
When our guest enters, extinguish the lamp and give him the impression that we are eating. When he reaches out to eat, get up and extinguish the lamp.” He said: So they sat down, and the guest ate. The guest could not see them, and they honoured their guest, who was desperate due to his condition.
This mercenary is desperate and has no clue what he is talking about. Rather, he simply follows his vain desires. Keep pushing out ridiculous content with scammers or accomplices of scammers.
That completely destroys Ali Dawah’s argument, the idiot @AliDawah
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 75
View 16 replies
Load more